Complaint System

At some point, you may have an issue with someone or something at CTS, be it harassment from a student, a disagreement with a faculty member, or a policy you deem to be discriminatory.

We take these issues very seriously. For that reason, we have set up a secure and discreet complaint system. We will work quickly and appropriately to help address your issue, whatever it may be.

Below you will find:

  1. Academic Grievance Policy and Academic Complaint Form. This confidential form will go Interim Academic Dean Emily Vogt.
  2. Anti-Harassment/Anti-Discrimination Policy with contact information,
  3. Lastly, the external links, below, should you wish to take your complaint beyond the jurisdiction of the school:

The Association of Theological Schools  |  The Higher Learning Commission  |  Illinois Board of Higher Education

Academic Grievance

The following procedures for academic grievance are intended to ensure fair treatment of students in regard to educational or related concerns. A starting assumption for the use of these procedures is that faculty members have ultimate responsibility for the evaluation of
student progress and the assigning of grades in their courses. A student’s unhappiness with a grade normally does not rise to the level of academic grievance, though disagreements about grades may be involved in academic grievance under exceptional circumstances.

Complaints regarding discrimination or harassment are handled under the Seminary’s Policy Against Discrimination and Harassment. Complaints about the fitness of a faculty member are handled under Faculty Discipline procedures as found in the Faculty Manual.

First Level
In a matter where there is disagreement between a student and a member of the faculty, or between a member of the faculty and other members of the Seminary community, the parties involved with one another should first speak with one another, clarifying the nature of the
problem, the issues involved, and possible responses or solutions to the conflict, with the goal of coming to a mutually agreed upon resolution of the matter among themselves without additional participation from other members of the community.

Second Level

If a conflict is of a nature or intensity that the procedure outlined in the First Level is not adequate or appropriate, any of the parties involved may request that the Academic Dean join them in a conversation where the following process will be followed:

  1. The persons involved in the conflict will attempt to state the nature of the conflict and describe their understanding of what is at stake in the disagreement. Each party will also describe their involvement thus far in the situation.
  2. The persons involved will then have the opportunity to suggest ways in which they believe the conflict might be resolved.
  3. With the third-party involvement of the Academic Dean, the persons involved will work in a collaborative effort to explore and then choose a satisfactory response and resolution to the conflict. Such collaboration may involve a single meeting or several meetings.
  4. If the Academic Dean is one of the subjects of a conflict, the President will fill the role of Academic Dean described above.
  5. The Academic Dean may make a written recommendation to the parties at thef conclusion of this process.

Third Level:

In a dispute where a resolution satisfactory to both parties is not achieved at the first or second level within 30 days, the Academic Dean will meet again with both parties as well as a senior faculty member (holding the rank of Full Professor), with each party involved in the conflict
having the opportunity to describe:

  1. the nature of the problem as s/he/they perceive it;
  2. the intellectual, theological, communal, personal, or emotional issues involved; and
  3. the significance of the issues and what is at stake for each person involved.

Either the student or the faculty member may choose to bring to this meeting a supportive student or faculty colleague. In cases where the Academic Dean is one of the subjects of a conflict, the President will fill the role of Academic Dean described above. At such time, in a spirit of collaboration, each person in this group will suggest various responses and resolutions to this conflict. Where such collaboration is not possible because of the dimensions or intensity of the conflict, the Academic Dean and the senior faculty member will determine what measures will be taken in an effort to resolve the dispute. At this stage, possible remedies range from further mediation (informal or formal) to referrals to the policy on Student Non-Academic Discipline (described in the Student Handbook) or the policy on Faculty Discipline Procedures (described in the Faculty Manual).

This Academic Grievance Policy is modeled on, and incorporates some material from, Grievance Procedures developed by Luther Seminary.

Academic Complaint Form

Fill out my online form.

 

Anti-Harassment/Anti-Discrimination

General Policy Statement and Notice of Non-Discrimination and Non-Harassment

Chicago Theological Seminary is committed to fostering the full humanity of all its members. All forms of discrimination and harassment impugn the full humanity of any human being and for this reason are not tolerated in this Seminary. Chicago Theological Seminary does not discriminate, or tolerate discrimination or harassment, against any member of its community on the basis of race, color, national origin, ancestry, sex/gender, age, religion, disability, pregnancy, veteran status, marital status, sexual orientation, or any other status protected by applicable federal, state, or local law in matters of employment or admissions or in any aspect of the educational programs or activities it offers.

In furtherance of Chicago Theological Seminary’s commitment to the principles of equality and equal opportunity for students, staff, and faculty, we have established a policy and associated procedures in order to provide a means to address complaints of discrimination or harassment based on the protected categories (described therein). The policy has been written with the express goal of protecting the rights and concerns of both complainant and respondent. The Seminary will make every effort to assure and protect these rights, and shall undertake no action that threatens or compromises them. The complete policy, detailing prohibited acts (discrimination, harassment, and sexual harassment), defining “consensual relationships,” and setting forth procedures for addressing discrimination and harassment (including reporting, inquiry, potential resolutions and appeals) is published in the Student Handbook and updated annually.

Title IX Coordinators

The Title IX Coordinators are responsible for implementing and monitoring Title IX compliance on behalf of the Seminary. This includes coordination of training, education, communications, and administration of the complaint and grievance procedures for the handling of suspected or alleged violations of Title IX.

Title IX Coordinator
Michele Carr
Controller
Office #153
773-896-2442
[email protected]

Title IX Deputy Coordinator
José Morales Torres
Assistant Professor of Latinx Studies & Religion
Office #138
773-896-2493
[email protected]